Editorial

A change of government in Bangladesh invariably brings new hopes, expectations and possibilities. In 2026, public expectations of the BNP government were high: an end to corruption, administrative transparency, the elimination of political patronage and the protection of public resources. Yet if allegations of corruption, extortion, irregularities and abuse of power continue even after a change of government, an uncomfortable question inevitably arises: has the political transition merely transferred power, or has it fundamentally transformed the culture of governance?

It is deeply disappointing when a political force that once sought public support by opposing corruption and authoritarian tendencies faces similar allegations after assuming office. The people did not grant any political party a licence to engage in corruption. Public power is a trust bestowed by citizens, not an instrument for personal enrichment by party leaders and activists.

Allegations of extortion, illegal occupation, tender manipulation or the misuse of administrative influence under the protection of political identity cannot be tolerated. Ensuring impartial investigations and justice is a moral obligation of the government. Intimidating complainants, providing political protection to alleged offenders or placing anyone above the law because of party affiliation poses a serious threat to democracy.

The greatest danger lies in the gap between rhetoric and action. Speaking against corruption is easy; taking action against corrupt individuals within one’s own party is far more difficult. This is where genuine political integrity is tested. If opposition figures are prosecuted while allegations against ruling-party members are ignored, such double standards will undermine public confidence in justice and the rule of law.

If the BNP government genuinely aspires to build a new Bangladesh, it must begin by enforcing party discipline and ensuring administrative accountability. Political affiliation must never determine the consequences of corruption allegations; accountability must be based on impartial investigations and established evidence. The Anti-Corruption Commission must be allowed to operate independently. Transparency must be guaranteed in public projects, procurement, recruitment and every aspect of government expenditure.

The people are no longer satisfied with a spectacle of political promises. They demand tangible action, accountability for wrongdoing and the protection of national resources. Without a firm and credible commitment to fighting corruption, the government cannot sustain its legitimacy or retain public trust.

The people changed the government to change the nature of corruption, not merely the identities of those involved. If a change of power fails to bring a change in the culture of corruption, the political consequences will eventually be borne by those in power themselves.